However, in an attempt to protect the public from the effects of passive smoking (second hand smoke)—of which, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service in 1994, “the statistical evidence does not . A study by the American Beverage Institute entitled “Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs” asked 300 respondents about the effects of the ban on their businesses. When asked if the ban caused owners to lay off employees or cut working hours, 29.7 percent of respondents answered “yes”; 59 percent gave the same answer when asked if they experienced a loss of tips/gratuities for bar and serving-staff employees (1). When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries. Many people who drink also tend to smoke; banning drinkers from smoking has hurt business in some bars and restaurants. since the prohibition took effect” (“Bar Owners Vow” 1).Tags: Pay You To Write My EssayThe Pit And The Pendulum Critical EssaysBusiness Plans Templates And SamplesDoing A Dissertation In A WeekCase Study Of Schizophrenia Paranoid TypeTransition Words List For EssaysEssay Write A Letter To Your FriendSchool Argumentative Essay TopicsWriting Literary Essay Structure
When they went to the doctors' office to find out how she had gotten it, the doctor linked it back to the second hand smoke that she was breathing in. Meyers, a professor of Cardiology and Preventive Medicine at University of Kansas (Sciencedaily.com). According to a statistical data collected by Live Strong, employers spend an extra $49 million in medical costs for employees who are exposed to secondhand smoking in their jobs (Nelson). Conclusion Smoking in public should be banned at a federal level without question.
When my great uncle found out about it, he finally started to care about where he was smoking and who he was with, and decided that he would smoke in a secluded place where no one but him may be affected. Middle Though many smokers already know of the health risks that come with smoking cigarettes, but what most of them do not, is how secondhand smoking can affect other people. Breathing in low doses of secondhand smoke can increase a person? Smokers should not risk non-smokers for something that they do. Smoking negatively affects people, the environment and businesses.
In modern society, the government knows better than to discriminate against minorities, senior citizens, or the physically handicapped; it does not hesitate, however, to discriminate against smokers. “Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs.”
Personal choice is a simple principle that is highly valued in American society.
When his daughter visited him for a vacation, she brought her three year old daughter with her.
The baby was healthy before coming to her grandpa's house, but in less than two weeks, she had developed ear infections and started to cough. secondhand smoking increases the likelihood of a heart attack by making the blood ? , making it more prone to clotting, and reducing the amount of good cholesterol in the body? Non-smokers should not be worrying about paying more medical bills, especially in today? Many businesses provide health insurance to their employees.
Banning smoking in public may lead to a better way of life and a healthier place to live.
The last sentence in Mary’s first paragraph forms the thesis for her research paper: she takes a strong, specific stand on a fairly controversial subject.
Smoking endangers people who chose not to engage in the same reckless behavior, like my baby cousin who had gotten so sick because of my great uncle? It also dirties our environment and harms other animals that are in search of food.
Businesses who provide health insurance to their workers affected by second hand smoking are wasting money that could be used to hire more employees.