The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.
The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.Tags: Extended Essays On Visual ArtsSociological Research Paper TopicsSolve My Word Math ProblemIs A Thesis Statement The Same As An AbstractPurdue Owl Research Paper FormatStatistics Class OnlineWhere To Buy Parchment Paper For WritingSolving Math Word Problems And Setting Up Equations
This is not consistent with the type of data collected.
The RLSS used a Likert scale (ordinal), yet a MANOVA would be most applicable for normally distributed, quantitative data.
Next, the student described specifics about the research design, including the sample, instrumentation, and data analysis.
Ecological and population generalizability were discussed. The student spoke at length on threats to internal validity.
The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed by Zhang, Jensen, and Mann in 1996.
This scale is used to measure six leadership behaviors: training and instruction, democratic, autocratic, social support, positive feedback, and situational consideration.
High school coaches scored much higher than college level coaches in democratic behavior.
Junior high coaches were significantly lower in training and instruction than either high school or college coaches.
The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors.
When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females.