Pro Euthanasia Essay Conclusion

Pro Euthanasia Essay Conclusion-65
5-Improvement of Palliative care: When people will not be allowed to do euthanasia naturally many pharmaceuticals will try to invent new drugs to find out cure of a certain illness which will bring improvement in health care and will open up new possibilities for the treatment of incurable diseases.Counter point: For old and invalid individuals nothing can bring a change accept that they are blessed with a new life which is not humanly possible in any way so voluntary euthanasia should be allowed to those old and ill who have no hope for any technology or medicine to cure them.In many cases we can’t distinguish between voluntary and in voluntary euthanasia so there is always a chance that we misjudge things.

Tags: Writing A Narrative Essay About YourselfEngineering Thesis PostersTu Delft Library Phd ThesisLead For An EssaySap Bi DissertationHow Long Is A 600 Word Essay

2-No surety of the fact that one’s consent is voluntary: maybe someone has agreed to give up life just out of emotions but she/he doesn’t mean it in real.

Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student.

This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service.

Euthanasia or mercy killing is a moral act done out of duty to those in suffering or an act for self-benefit under cover of morality or is it opening door to many illegal issues in the society. Narrowly speaking it is equivalent to killing so in these terms if allowing a person to die is not killing than its not euthanasia.

Euthanasia should never be legalized in any of its forms else it will be practiced in all cases even where consent of a patient is not taken into account, for personal benefits by relatives, health insurance companies or the state. By considering this we can conclude that allowing someone to die can be moral but killing someone which comes under euthanasia is wrong.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Pro Euthanasia Essay Conclusion

The Latest from arenda-proektorov.ru ©