This chapter focuses primarily on research in the area of prehospital EMS, including prehospital trauma care.
This chapter focuses primarily on research in the area of prehospital EMS, including prehospital trauma care.Currently, a range of federal government agencies each contribute relatively small amounts of funding to prehospital EMS research.Tags: Mary Shelly Frankenstein EssaysColleges That Require Essays For AdmissionEssay On Robbery In BankCollege Essay GuideUbc Creative Writing CoursesIntroductory Paragraph With ThesisGretel Ehrlich Essays
The objectives of this study were to provide an overview of the emergency care system in the U.
S., explore its strengths, limitations, and future challenges, describe a desired vision of the emergency care system, and recommend strategies needed to achieve that vision.
Research provides an evidence base to support the application of particular medical treatments and raises red flags when interventions are demonstrated to cause harm to patients.
Systems-related research seeks to address operational and structural questions such as the optimum configuration of EMS personnel and the impact of medical direction in EMS systems.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) all have programs in place to support research in this area.
But while the federal government dedicates tens of billions of dollars each year to health-related research, a tiny percentage of that funding is directed to emergency care research in general and prehospital emergency care in particular.
The pediatric emergency care subcommittee provided insights in Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains concerning challenges that define EMS services for youths, such as lack of pediatric training in professional education and health services and clinical research.
This group also studied the shortcomings of emergency services provided to children and adolescents.
In three consensus reports released in 2006, the Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System documented the state of affairs and discussed ways to improve the 9-1-1 and medical dispatch systems, prehospital emergency medical services (EMS), and hospital-based emergency and trauma care networks that serve adults and children.
To develop these reports, the staff and committee chair organized the committee into three subcommittees (that included external participation from individuals not affiliated with the primary consensus committee) to address focal areas of emergency care: prehospital services, pediatric emergency care, and hospital-based emergency care.