Iraq Just War Essay

Iraq Just War Essay-28
The problem is that the evidence for such weapons was ‘sporadic and patchy’ in the words of the official Butler report.The Governments’ claim that they were acting on behalf of the UN was also weakened by the lack of substantial international support for military operations, evidenced by the reluctance of the Security Council explicitly to endorse such action through a second resolution.We now know that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.

The problem is that the evidence for such weapons was ‘sporadic and patchy’ in the words of the official Butler report.The Governments’ claim that they were acting on behalf of the UN was also weakened by the lack of substantial international support for military operations, evidenced by the reluctance of the Security Council explicitly to endorse such action through a second resolution.We now know that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.

Tags: Federal Resume CourseworkGood Thesis ParagraphsResearch Paper On Aids EpidemicReligion In Politics In EssaySavagery And The Amerindian EssayHow To Solve Any Problem

In other words, is war likely to bring about more good than harm?

So how does the Iraq War fare against these criteria?

The tragedy of the Iraq conflict is that those responsible were trying to make the world a better and safer place and were supported by military forces that have, on the whole, exhibited remarkable restraint and courage.

But, as the just war doctrine – forged from painful experience over the centuries – teaches, noble aspirations are not enough.

The war failed fully to meet any of the just war criteria. The charge against the Iraq War is not, however, that it fell somewhat short of a number of conditions.

But rather that such individual failures, when taken together, mutually reinforced each other, so building up cumulatively to support the conclusion that the war was undertaken without sufficient just cause and without adequate planning to ensure a just outcome.Different reasons were adduced at different times for the war.But the declared grounds common to both the US and UK Governments was to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction, so enforcing UN Security Council Resolutions.Tweet There has been much recent debate about whether the 2003 Iraq War was legal, with both Tony Blair and his Attorney General summoned before the Chilcot enquiry to give evidence on this.But a more fundamental question is whether the war was .The Iraq War was, like most wars, fought from a mixture of motives.But the concerns over WMD proliferation were genuinely held, however shaky may have been their foundation.It has to be undertaken: for a just cause, with right intention, with competent authority, as a last resort, and the harm judged likely to result should not outweigh the good achieved, taking into account the probability of success; while in its conduct the principles of proportion and non-combatant immunity have to met; and the war end in a just peace.This may appear over-prescriptive: erecting so many hurdles that war would become impossible.We will only use your personal information to register you for OUPblog articles.To contribute to the public discussion of whether the United States and its allies should invade Iraq, the U. Institute of Peace organized a symposium on December 17, 2002 to address the question "Would an Invasion of Iraq Be a "Just War"?

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Iraq Just War Essay

The Latest from arenda-proektorov.ru ©