After that, the organisation will vary according to the kind of research being reported.
Below are some important principles for reporting experimental, quantitative (survey) and qualitative studies.
If you have nothing to write, write 'I have nothing to write'. It probably won’t produce text you can use in your thesis, but it might help to clarify your ideas and show you ways to structure your argument. For some fields of study, the presentation and discussion of findings follows established conventions; for others, the researcher’s argument determines the structure.
Therefore it is important for you to investigate the conventions of your own discipline, by looking at journal articles and theses.
So it is worth finding out what conclusions your brain has reached while you were collecting and analysing your data. This is why reporting data analysis is not enough; you need to:in order to make clear your contribution to knowledge in the field.
Evans and Gruba suggest you try these techniques: 1. Now check the headings against your research question(s). Use these groups and headings to make a plan of the points you want to make in your discussion. This page and the next, on reporting and discussing your findings, deal with the core of the thesis.
It is usually expressed in words, and this results in a large quantity of written material, through which you must guide your reader. Try to make your sections and subsections reflect the themes that have emerged from your analysis of the data, and to make sure your reader knows how these themes evolved.
Headings and subheadings, as well as directions to the reader, are forms of signposting you can use to make these chapters easy to navigate.
For others, the data already exists (in the form of archival documents or literary texts, for example), and the work of interpreting it begins much earlier in the research process.
Whatever kind of research you are doing, there comes a moment when your head is full of ideas that have emerged from your analysis.