The pair ended their romantic relationship in mid-2016 but remained friendly until later that year.
Soon after, the woman confronted Barrett about rumors that he was now sexually involved with another student on campus.
Barrett was placed on administrative leave almost immediately, pending an investigation.
Bloomsburg formally terminated him the next month, citing his lack of professional judgment in engaging in sexual relationships with two students and “engaging in sexual conduct” without the student’s consent.
We are your essential ally and coach throughout the entire college application process – from brainstorming essay ideas, to keeping students on tight deadlines throughout essay drafting, to proofing and polishing all essays and applications before submission.
We are a mediator throughout the process, ensuring that students take ownership over their own essays and applications, while welcoming and incorporating input from parents.The professor, John Barrett, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Court documents say that he taught one of the students in question in 2015 and began dating her the next semester, when she was no longer in his class but still a student at Bloomsburg.Barrett’s faculty union, the Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties, field a grievance on his behalf, on that grounds that Bloomsburg fired him without just cause.The case went to arbitration, and Barrett was awarded reinstatement and back pay.Bloomsburg relied heavily on the first student’s allegation of nonconsensual touching.In his opinion for the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, Judge P.These decisions all have cited the fact that Morgan has not engaged in criminal behavior in the many years since his conviction.The statewide public faculty union also supported Morgan in his grievance. And the arbitrator determined that if these acts had occurred, they happened in the context of a consensual sexual relationship and not as an act of sexual harassment.While Bloomsburg is acting as if it must reinstate “a criminal,” Brobson wrote, the “obvious problem with the university’s contention here is that there is no record that [Barrett] was ever charged with, prosecuted for or convicted of indecent sexual assault stemming from the alleged acts.” An arbitration award “is not the proper venue to litigate whether a grievant is guilty of a crime,” Brobson added.