Gil Cedillo was elected to the Assembly, Senate, and now serves on the Los Angeles City Council, championing immigrant rights during his entire career.My good friend Kevin de Léon is the current President Pro Tem of the State Senate.But at the march, they were fighting for their rights in front of television cameras.
Gil Cedillo was elected to the Assembly, Senate, and now serves on the Los Angeles City Council, championing immigrant rights during his entire career.My good friend Kevin de Léon is the current President Pro Tem of the State Senate.But at the march, they were fighting for their rights in front of television cameras.Tags: 79 Essays On Graphic DesignEssay On Life Is Not Just A Bed Of RosesNarrative Essay Lesson PlansCase Study Supply Chain Management At Dell Dell'S Direct ModelLiterature Review On Project ManagementCustom College Essay Writing ServiceNyu College Application EssayMedia Studies Coursework BlogHow To Write A Good Literature ReviewCatcher Rye Literary Elements Essay
We lost the battle: Prop 187 passed, though it was later deemed unconstitutional and was never implemented.
In retrospect, not all of our tactics were as politically astute as they should have been, but we were passionate, and we were angry.
What surprised Pete Wilson and his Republican colleagues was that their plan to push people to the margins of society achieved the exact opposite.
People were so outraged, so motivated, and so galvanized by this blatant attack on their American Dream that they moved out of the shadows and pledged to show the world that they were real people with real hopes and real aspirations. The first, on February 28, 1994 in Los Angeles, was 20,000 strong; many of the attendees were people who, just a few short months earlier, were nervous about attending parents’ night at their child’s school for fear of running into authorities who would deport them.
Substitute former California Governor “Pete Wilson” for “Donald Trump” as the author of some of these quotes, and you could convince me that we are living in 1994 California, not 2017 America. In 1994, California was still mired in recession, lagging behind the rest of the country in what would become the remarkable economic recovery of the 1990s.
Instead of focusing on housing, job creation, higher education, or retraining workers for the burgeoning information economy, some prominent Republicans decided it was easier to blame “illegal” immigrants, despite persistent statistics that immigrants use fewer public services than native-born residents. Arriving at a time when Latinos were beginning to reach critical mass in California, Prop 187 was almost perfectly (if unintentionally) designed to galvanize a generation of activists—which is exactly what it did.
I was 27 years old in 1994, working at a nonprofit helping immigrants navigate the difficulties of life in Los Angeles, alongside some friends including Gilbert Cedillo and Kevin de Léon.
We immediately saw this for what it was: an attempt to lay the blame for persistent economic uncertainty at the feet of a growing minority—the “Other.” So, we did what we were good at: We organized people; we rallied; and we tried to show that the Latino population couldn’t be taken for granted.
Like them, Trump is appealing to people with very real economic concerns by scapegoating an entire class of people who are not the cause of it.
Just as 187’s backers avoided the very real and very difficult challenges of adapting to a new kind of economy, Trump is evoking a past that never really existed as somehow “great again.” He is also ignoring data as he pursues demagoguery.