Those who do not meet authorship criteria but who contributed to the work may be named in an acknowledgement section with their permission.All papers undergo peer review, except for some commentaries and letters and editorials that may be peer reviewed or reviewed only by the Editors.Institutional review and ethics boards make determinations about consent for research.Tags: Write A Problem Solution EssayEssay On Republic Day In SchoolWarrant Argumentative EssayEssays On Music In The Byzantine WorldTelstra Business Mobile Phone PlansCreative Nonfiction Writing ExercisesAndrew Carnegie Research Paper
If a case report or case series is deemed to be research (systematic collection of data with an intent to generalize the findings) then report of approval and relevant consent should be stated as with all other research.
Consent from the subject (or parent/guardian) should be obtained for all case reports.
Consent can be on an institutional document or one similar to the examples below (modified as appropriate), and should be stored for seven years and made available to the editors and publisher on request.
State in the cover letter that written consent to publish a report of the case has been obtained by the subject and that it is available for review by the editors and publisher of the journal.
In addition, each author must complete and submit the journal’s copyright transfer agreement, which includes a section on the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest based on the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals” (A copy of the form is made available to the submitting author within the Editorial Manager submission process.
Co-authors will automatically receive an Email with instructions on completing the form upon submission.
Names should be removed from any figures or photographs. For any manuscripts involving human subjects’ research, always include a statement in the methods section describing ethics (institutional review) board review and approval and consent.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, author must confirm that the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 2004: If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach, and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.
Note that such consent is different from research participant consent, which applies to systematic investigation of a subject or subjects with intent to generalize the findings.
Consent to publish the details of an individual’s case is obtained to respect the person’s right to privacy.